![]() |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
This not in fact a matter of one flow overcoming another flow, it is a matter of two unequal pressures, presented with a single outlet. ;) |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
Quote:
Trevor, can you show us a diagram about this V8 you are talking about? Or is it general to all Ford V8's? |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
1 Attachment(s)
For the recod the big book says 100lpm @ 3,000rpm and 200lpm @ 6,000rpm.
I have cut my manifold as you can see from the image the next plan if that doesn't fix the problem will be to put a new pipe inthe centre were the ruler is. That pipe will be 40mm as opposed to 30mm it is now. Next change the water pump inlet pipe from 30mm to 45mm if possiable. Also both inlet and outlet on the radiator changed to suit I feel sure the inlet and out lets of the motor are both 30mm will cause a problem. Centrifugal pumps always have a larger inlet then outlet to prevent caviation. Great the way everyone is jumping on board I think if a few of us run tests we will beat this problem finally. Have a great day or night. Tony |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
Coolant circulating too quickly, was the accepted diagnosis, in respect of the old flat head V8 Ford. This I know because in the early 1950s, I did very well in club competitions, using one of these engines in an AC sports car of 1935 vintage. Incidentally, a fan was not used and the car also served as family transport.:D Quote:
The Ford dual pumps were far too efficient and the cure was to reduce this quite radically. Drill all the rotor blades, or knock off every other one. Cast iron made them easy to break. Water at high pressure and full of air, is not an efficient coolant. Recesses are passed over, pockets are formed and hot spots result. Cheers, Trevor. |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
P.S. The fact that a flow has been stated for 6,000 RPM, is surely a sign that cavitation within the pump is unlikely. Keep at it. :D |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
|
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Why not run a bypass in the cross over pipe so that the left hand stream enters the flow of the right post headers...
or not even mix them at all until they hit the rad with a Y like junction? Radiator Tomyx? -Sov |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
The position of the radiator inlet favors the right side bank in terms of length and position. The left side would be toooo long besides finding a way to make it reach there and clearance issues. It would be ideal though if possible. :o |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
By the way if you look at the manifold on the car water goes from the left bank throught the throttle bodie and in to the manifold on the right bank. The only way this can happen is if there is a pressure difference from one side to the other, eg a major restriction in the centre. Tony |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Did a quick calc and if the pipes go from 30mm to 42ID the flow will double.
Tony |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Tony,
Have you confirmed that your modified pipe will still fit under the intake? If "yes", could you provide some dimensions on the pieces of Al you welded on? Thanks. -Bill |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Quote:
|
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
Trevor,
Would you accept that as flow goes up pressure has to increase as the restriction beomes a bigger issue. That said then all things are not equal and flow must be reduce in proportion to revs. Tony |
Re: SVX Engine cooling "Again & Again"
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a pump curve to explain
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2015 SVX World Network
(208)-906-1122